Law.com Home Newswire LawJobs CLE Center LawCatalog Our Sites Advertise
New York Lawyer Advertisement:
A New York Law Journal publication

Home | Register | Login | Classified Ads | Message Boards

Search

Public Notices
New! Create a Domestic LLC/LLP Public Notice
Law Firms
NYLJ Professional
Announcements
The NYLJ 100
The AmLaw 100
The AmLaw 200
The AmLaw Midlevel
Associates Survey
The Summer
Associates Survey
The NLJ 250
Beyond Firms
The New York Bar Exam
Pro Bono
NYLJ Fiction Contest
Get Advice
Advice for the Lawlorn
Crossroads
Work/Life Wisdom
Message Boards
Services
Contact Us
Corrections
Make Us Your
Home Page
Shop LawCatalog.com
This Week's
Public Notices
Today's Classified Ads
Who We Are
 
 
Pro Bono

New York City Pro Bono Training Calendar
New York State Pro Bono Opportunities Guide

NY Partner Faces Off Against U.S. in World Court in Pro Bono Fight

New York Lawyer
July 17, 2008

By Nate Raymond
The American Lawyer

Subscribe to The American Lawyer

In the race to stop the execution of a Mexican citizen in Texas, a Debevoise & Plimpton lawyer has found himself facing off against the United States in the World Court.

On Wednesday, the International Court of Justice ruled the U.S. must take "all measures necessary" to stop the executions of five Mexican nationals facing death sentences in Texas. One of the nationals, José Medellín, is scheduled for execution August 5. Debevoise partner Donald Francis Donovan has represented Medellín pro bono as his case jumped between the U.S. Supreme Court and the World Court. Donovan also represents Mexico.

"We are confident the United States and the State of Texas will comply with the ICJ's order and stay the August 5th execution of Mr. Medellín," Donovan said in a statement.

Enforcing the order will be tricky, however. In 2004, the World Court determined that 51 Mexican nationals weren't told they could seek help from their consulate upon arrest, a violation of the Vienna Convention. The court ordered the United States to review each case to determine if any of them were harmed by the violation.

The Bush administration ordered states, including Texas, to comply with the order. But the U.S. Supreme Court ruled 6-3 in March that order was unconstitutional. The Washington Post reports that the Bush administration expects today's decision will have little impact.


 






All Today's Classified Ads
ATTORNEY
Wall Street area.

114 Old Country Road.
Mineola.

lawjobs
Search For Jobs

Job Type

Region

Keyword (optional)


LobbySearch
Find a Lobbyist
Practice Area
State Ties


Terms of Use and Privacy Policy

Incisive Media About Incisive Media | About Law.com | Customer Support | Terms & Conditions 
  © 2008 ALM Properties, Inc. All rights reserved.